| July 3, 2012
Government Spending Problem Not Limited to Washington
The columnist Mark Steyn has memorably noted that “the government of the United States is broker than any entity has ever been in the history of the planet. Officially, Washington has to return 15,000,000,000,000 dollars just to get back to having nothing at all.”
What’s more, Steyn says, “that 15,000,000,000,000 dollars is a very lowball figure that conveniently ignores another $100 trillion in unfunded liabilities that the government, unlike private businesses, is able to keep off the books.”
In his important new book The Debt Bomb, U.S. Sen. Tom Coburn shares a quote from Admiral Mike Mullen, former chairman of the Joint Chiefs of Staff under President Obama: “Our national debt is our biggest national security threat.”
University of Oklahoma historian J. Rufus Fears made similar remarks last year at a talk at OCPA. Dr. Fears, an OCPA distinguished fellow, issued a stern rebuke to politicians whose reckless borrowing-and-spending spree leaves us at the mercy of xenophobic despots who hate us.
The politicians in Washington have failed us. But the ones here at home are also part of the problem.
As the chart on page 12 shows, Oklahoma government spending is at an all-time high. Total state spending continues to increase every year (analysts at both liberal and conservative think tanks in Oklahoma agree on this point). Much of this is federal money.
Cato Institute analyst Tad DeHaven, a former budget policy advisor to Sen. Coburn, says state policymakers have become “dangerously reliant on federal money.” In a very real sense, Oklahoma policymakers receive federal bailouts every year. They either don’t know or don’t care that, as Coburn says, “America is already bankrupt.”
And what are all these federal bailouts accomplishing? What government spending is so important that it justifies borrowing all this money from China?
One of the chief culprits fueling our national debt—and our Oklahoma spending spree—is Medicaid. Arguably the worst health care program in the country, Medicaid is “a disaster for low-income patients,” Dr. Coburn says. In The Debt Bomb he cites several examples of Medicaid harming the poor, and says we need to be “protecting the poor from government.”
But instead, Oklahoma policymakers have managed to get more people into the program—even resorting to gimmicks and tax hikes to do so. Spend, spend, spend—even though former Medicaid boss Donald Berwick acknowledges that 20 to 30 percent of health spending is “waste.”
It’s one thing to want to help the truly needy. But policymakers spend our money blithely, not bothering to distinguish between the deserving poor and the undeserving poor. Oklahoma spends millions of dollars each year bribing mothers not to marry the fathers of their children. Food-stamp felons conduct business openly on Twitter. No matter. Politicians just keep spending money we don’t have.
Recently at Forbes.com, Peter Ferrara pointed out that President Obama is the biggest government spender in world history. Here at home, Oklahoma’s current political leaders are the biggest government spenders in state history.
Wisconsin Gov. Scott Walker’s recent triumph was important, The Wall Street Journal editorialized, because it was a test of whether “taxpayers have any hope of controlling the entitlement state and its dominant special interests.” Will Gov. Walker’s victory embolden Oklahoma’s political leaders to cut government spending? One can hope.
Dr. Coburn has identified the problem in Washington: Careerist politicians, seduced by power and position, refuse to set priorities because cutting spending isn’t truly important to them.
We have the identical problem in Oklahoma City.